| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This was the case of the bash packaging error where a file was removed from
the package but not the backup array.
I just added a sanity check so that only the files from the backup array
that are also in the filelist are used.
I had to edit upgrade026 pactest slightly : it required the file to be
copied to .pacsave instead of moved. But just moving it should be enough, as
we agreed on the ML :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010440.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This adds a pactest for the relocation of a config file between two packages
(case of etc/profile moving from bash to filesystem).
While running this pactest, I found out that chk_filedifference didn't work
correctly with an empty list as second argument. So that's fixed now.
Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010610.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This is something pacman can do on its own straight from the archive, and we
will reduce the chance of problems occurring becuase of inproper FILELIST
generation as we have had in the past with special characters in filenames.
Once we remove it from makepkg. we can remove any usage of it from all of
our other tools, including pacman, pactest, and contrib/ utilities.
Note that removing it from pacman uncovered a few other bugs anyway, so this
was probably a good move.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This is the bash case when the /etc/profile file was removed by error from
the package, but stayed in the backup array.
Ref:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-December/003556.html
Also fixed a little typo in add.c, but it's disabled code.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
query002 and sync1100 had PACMAN_OUTPUT rules that looked at the
build/install date (localized).
Instead of looking at the month name, it will now check the year, which
should be safer.
I also had to add another pactest (query005) for keeping the same coverage.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
You can use foo<2.0 and foo>2.0 as depend
add046.py and add047.py pactests were added to check this
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Due to commit da1222de2e30aabcae9d17bbfa10bbf0672338af, we can now use
fakechroot to completely run scriptlet pactests
Use "which" functionality so as not to REQUIRE it for all users
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
|
|
Check for existence of the logfile first, and output an error if not found
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Update the GPL boilerplate to direct people to the GNU website for a copy of
the license, as well as bump all of Judd's copyrights to 2007.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
These new tests test the following ops at least once:
-Ss, -Si, -Sl, -Sp, -Qs, -Qi, -T
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
I started playing around with gcov today and it showed a few places in the
code that we don't test at all. This is the start of ensuring that we
execute most of the code in our codebase.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This pactest checks what happens if a package exists in two sync repos.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Dan: added sync1006, same test with different versions]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
checkdeps and resolvedeps now take both a remove list and an install list as
arguments, allowing dependencies to be calculated correctly.
This broke the sync990 pactest, but this pactest used dependencies and
provides in an unusual way, so it has been changed.
Dan: the sync990 pactest was just plain wrong. It didn't satisfy the
dependencies correctly, so should never have succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: some variable renaming, clarification in commit message]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This operation made sense in the days before sync DBs existed, but it no
longer has the same usefulness it once did.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch introduces versioned provisions in "provision 1.0-1" format.
_alpm_db_whatprovides was modified accordingly (added sync500.py),
alpm_depcmp was modified accordingly (add043.py passes now; added add044.py
and add045.py).
Notes:
alpm_db_search now uses the whole versioned %PROVIDES% string in its search.
debug logging was simplified in alpm_depcmp.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Xavier: fixed a few typos, duplicate const strings with strdup before
modifying them, put some debugging back in alpm_depcmp, minor code cleanups
(var/function renaming), added a note in PKGBUILD man page.]
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
[Dan: made strcmp checks clearer, added a comment]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Remove any checks dealing with requiredby from pactest (but not actually
from the pactests themselves). Of course, we should probably find a new way
to check requiredby values of packages since there is no guarantee our code
is working perfectly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
The pactest demonstrates what happens if fileconflict was found after the
removal part of a sync transaction.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Currently alpm_depcmp uses pkg->version as a version number for provisions,
which is odd. The failure of the pactest demonstrates this.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Also tell pactest to reset IgnoreGroup like it does for IgnorePkg.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
One currently should succeed (006), and 005 fails.
requiredby005.py is originally from Nagy Gabor <ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This passes with both the upcoming 3.1 devel tree and the 3.0.6 pacman code.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Actually use python commands to generate the filelist instead of os.system
calls that don't necessarily work everywhere. Noticed when running "make
check" on FreeBSD where the tar program is actually bsdtar.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
As seen with the recent upgrade of pacman and the removal of the
pacman.d/current mirrorlist, files that were formerly in the backup array
get deleted upon their removal, which could be dangerous. Instead, we should
use the combined backup array of the old and new package. This fix should
address this issue in a relatively straightforward way.
In addition, old files should be moved to pacsave locations as expected.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
That is the problem mentioned by Nagy there (with suggestions for fixing it) :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009082.html
If a dependency conflicts with a local package and has to replace it,
the PM_SYNC_TYPE_DEPEND information is lost, and the resulting install
reason is wrong (the package is marked as explictly installed).
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
remove048 is the case mentioned there (fails in 3.0 but works in 3.1) :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009294.html
It's the same as remove046 with -R instead of -Rc.
sync060 is a case reported this morning on IRC :
a pacman -Su wanted to replace gensplashutils by gensplash,
but pacman said gensplashutils was required by initscripts-gensplash,
while initscripts-gensplash was not even installed.
This is also fixed in the current 3.1 code though.
upgrade02{4,5} are the backup handling problem I described there :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009376.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
remove047 : Remove a package required by other packages
conflict004 : a package conflicts with itself
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009077.html
sync400 : Install package with dep that conflicts with older version of package
sync401 : Ensure we choose provider already in target list
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/009041.html
sync402/sync403 (failing) : Choice between two providers
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008787.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
The sync package pkg3 depends on the sync package pkg2, but pkg1 replaces pkg2.
So pkg2 is added to the remove list.
When checkdeps checks if pkg2 can be removed, it looks at the packages that require pkg2
(with the RequiredBy field of pkg2), but this doesn't contain pkg3 at this point.
RequiredBy fields are only updated after the packages are installed.
Proposed solution : checkdeps should know both the remove and upgrade list to decide properly.
Reference:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008972.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch cleans up and fix the _alpm_trans_update_depends function
and ensure that all requiredby fields are filled in case of multiple satisfiers
(previously, the handling of mutliple satisfiers in that function was inconsistent).
This makes a special case handling of requiredby in commit_single_pkg() obsolete,
and so allows cleaning that code as well.
Also fixed upgrade056 pactest because :
1) the requiredby fields were wrong, and this wouldn't happen with the fixed _alpm_trans_update_depends().
2) this is a very unusual case anyway (and handling all corner cases combined to a broken database
seems nearly impossible to achieve).
References :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008919.html
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008920.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
A side effect of the previous commit ( ea9a756eeaca7398c0860b55f8abe2932ad195bd )
is that it's now possible to use versioned conflicts.
Add two new conflict pactests for showing it.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
Reference:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008971.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
.gitignore works recursively, so we don't need Makefile and Makefile.in
in all of the subdirectory .gitignore files.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
This test installs three packages with a circular dependency,
to check everything still goes fine in that case.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
This replaces the former -D operation that was undocumented and rather
hacky. It can be used with add, upgrade, or sync transactions and will affect
all packages installed. Should close FS #7193.
Also tell makepkg to use this new flag.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
The resolvedeps function was a bit negligent, as showed by the sync011 pactest.
Reference :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008782.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
Currently the replaces flag is only used for forcing the replacement
of package (eg because of a renaming) on sysupgrade operation.
If the replaces flag should also be used for resolving conflicts,
then it should be discussed and specified correctly first.
References:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7415#comment17207
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-June/008553.html
commit which introduced the replace flag : 4fcec8f03ff790bfb23b826eee169bc9c0b00142
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
sync022 was added here:
39b654965580bfb7dc0ab72b8c901fbf7729a568
This pactest reverses the installed package to see if it is correctly
picked, in order to test some further changes to this depcheck code that
currently makes sync022 fail.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Another test a bit more complicated for -Rs,
to prevent regression if removedeps is changed.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
This indicates a problem in the current removedeps function
(no version checking) for which Nagy proposed a fix here :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-June/008539.html
But as he mentioned there, a better fix might be to use the checkdeps
function in the removedeps one.
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
