summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/libalpm/version.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2011-08-23vercmp: ensure 2.0a and 2.0.a do not compare equalDan McGee
We had this interesting set of facts conundrum, according to vercmp return values: 2.0a < 2.0 2.0 < 2.0.a 2.0a == 2.0.a This introduces a code change that ensures '2.0a < 2.0.a' as would be expected by the first two comparisons. Unfortunately this stays us a bit further from upstream RPM code, but those are the breaks (in RPM, the versions involving 'a' do in fact compare the same, but they are both greater than the bare '2.0'). Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-08-23Style-match rpmvercmp code with upstreamDan McGee
Not sure how or why some of this differed, but it is easy enough to set it back to how it was so it is easier to diff. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-03-20Style change: return(x) --> return xDan McGee
This was discussed and more or less agreed upon on the mailing list. A huge checkin, but if we just do it and let people adjust the pain will end soon enough. Rebasing should be relatively straighforward for anyone that sees conflicts; just be sure you use the new return style if possible. The following semantic patch was used to do the change, along with some hand-massaging in order to preserve parenthesis where appropriate: The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows, although some hand-massaging was done in order to keep parenthesis where appropriate: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression a; @@ - return(a); + return a; // </smpl> A macros_file was also provided with the following content: Additional steps taken, mainly for ASSERT() macros: $ sed -i -e 's#return(NULL)#return NULL#' lib/libalpm/*.c $ sed -i -e 's#return(-1)#return -1#' lib/libalpm/*.c Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-21Allow version comparison to contain epoch specifierDan McGee
Adapting from RPM, follow the [epoch:]version[-release] syntax. We can also borrow some of their parsing code for our purposes (thanks!). Add some new tests to our vercmp shell script tester for epoch comparisons, and then make the code work with these newfangled epoch specifiers. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-07Update copyright years for 2011Allan McRae
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-05-04Remove call to function loggerDan McGee
It isn't really necessary here and it helps us get rid of some link pollution so we can have a slim vercmp binary. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-05-04Move vercmp code into a separate fileDan McGee
This will facilitate using this object file on its own in the vercmp tool which will be done in a future commit. The net impact on the generated binaries should not be noticeable after this commit. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>